But for me it is quite big for the minimum deposit (0.002 BTC) less than that the funds will be lost.
I just want to try with a smaller deposit.
I'm also looking for smaller minimums as I tend to have these use cases.
At the moment, there's an exchange that piqued my interest. They have a low minimum during my check:

Exolix - They have the typical KYC/AML policies on their platform but OrangeFren is claiming guaranteed never-kyc for OF users.
Honestly, what do you all think about such claim? On Exolix, they'll probably make us agree to their TOS that includes typical KYC/AML policies. But OrangeFren is reputed and Exolix has $5K OF guaranteed funds on them so might be worth jumping the gun with smaller amounts? 🤔

Swapuz is a ChangeNOW reseller, and they also run another site called
Exolix, which similarly resells ChangeNOW’s services.
If you look at the Swapuz Terms of Service from February 2022 (archived here =
https://web.archive.org/web/20220213142831/swapuz.com/assets/index.223d937f.js), you’ll find direct references to Exolix. This connection was public knowledge for a while, and both Swapuz and Exolix were listed on Kyc Not Me until someone mentioned off the Kyc Not Me admin about this relationship. As a result, Swapuz was promptly removed from the Kyc Not Me listings.
Despite being caught, representatives from both Swapuz and Exolix have continued to deny any connection between the two platforms. They maintain this stance in public, even though their link was exposed due to a fairly basic oversight.
Given their reluctance to be transparent about their relationship, it’s wise to be cautious and perhaps avoid using either service until they openly acknowledge their connection.
There was also a notable thread on Bitcointalk (⚠️⚠️ 300M+ Ongoing Biggest Crypto Scam LEAK [Changelly & Freewallet and more] ⚠️ =
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5499189), which investigated ChangeNOW and its network of related projects-allegedly operated with forged documents.
Exolix was mentioned as part of this network, raising even more questions about its background and trustworthiness.
I would not suggest you to use them.