You are not wrong. But you are running the simulation with one outcome (ultra-wealth or irrelevance) as the only valid one. And that perspective is the exact framework that keeps people enslaved into "non-human" status unless they break the ceiling. Wealth concentration is accelerating, no debate there. Geographic, legal, and social insulating barriers protect the asset-owning elite. But is the answer really to internalize that reality as an identity? So, you're basically a "non-human" if you don't have a Belgravia address or spend $50,000 on a weekend in Dubai?

If wealth be the only criterion for human existence, then 99.9% of people living today are subhuman? Do their choices, contributions, inventiveness, and moral sense mean nothing? Should that be the world we are validating, the world is not just unfair but also functionally non-operational

Actually, this is a value crisis. Rich people live beyond the crisis blast radius since they control law, networks, and assets. That is true. But it is ridiculous to simplify everything to "10MUSD = human, $1M = failure". So long as people keep thinking that owning a yacht is the only way to really matter, capital will keep any resistance at bay

There is no call for pity here. It is a call for economic system awareness. People are shifting into Bitcoin, tokenized assets, and digital sovereignty for a reason. Because the state-corporate wealth prison is getting too small to breathe in. You’re not wrong that money determines access. But you're also not doomed unless you believe access is the only form of freedom