Re: DT1 and DT2 members who have negative feedback (or are banned)

Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 08:21:56 AM

Quote from: nutildah on Today at 08:13:06 AM

Their negative trust reads:

Quote from: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=579628

2025-01-03

leaking confidential information, for good of all - is ethical? in 2025 i think not

So babo's feedback went from "i dont know," in 2019 to "in 2025 i think not" 5.5 years later. That doesn't make sense, even if the interpretation would have changed in 2025, the event happened in 2019.

The feedback went from a neutral feedback which was a note to self to redtrust? All for what? Shocked

I didn't go through the whole thread, but I believe it was created in good faith and if we are to update our trust ratings because of the changes over the years, then I wonder how things would look right now.
Imagine sentencing someone to jail 5 years later for something that was not illegal back then when they did it, but is now illegal.

Also, very many people post PMs and chats from different suspects, scammers etc. as proof. Going by the "ethics", is he suggesting they should be tagged too?