In short you just proved exactly what I said, the blockade that Yemen is enforcing on the terrorist regime of Israel that is found guilty of carrying out genocide in Gaza by International Criminal Court is working. No ship is passing the blocked sea route for them to seize or hit according to the international law and the genocide convention Yemen is enforcing.
So when United States Director of National Intelligence confirms to the congress that they were supporting al-Qaeda in Syria and when Timber Sycamore files proved that with evidence, it is not just proving US was doing it. It also proves the "coalition" that includes England was up to their neck in it. All in support of Israel.
Not to mention that right now your country is one of the main supporters of the terrorist occupiers of Palestine and you have forces there on the ground participating in the genocide in Gaza, in addition to all the weapons, equipment, money, intelligence, ... that you are giving these terrorists.
So in a way, ICC is not finding Israel to be guilty of genocide it is also finding its supporters to be guilty of it as well.
Here's another example: this is YOUR diplomat that YOU elected rubbing shoulders with the new head of al-Qaeda branch and the second in command and a strong believer in and follower of Bin Ladan (the old head of al-Qaeda terrorist group). He is the head of a new terrorist group that was created with the help of NATO in support of Israel to secure the Eastern front (ie. Syria) for the Zionist occupiers of Palestine:
So when you claim you do not support these terrorist groups, you either have to claim you live in a dictatorship where you have no say in what the British regime does, or you have to claim that you are against the British regime. Which is it?
Of course you always choose the third option which is denying everything and sometimes going as far as saying terrorist groups like al-Qaeda aren't even terrorist groups!
i dont support isreal or gaza or yeman or america..
im british.
As a taxpayer in what you claim to be democracy and a member of NATO and also the key participant in illegal invasions of Iraq and Syria in coalitions named "Coalition of the Willing" and "Operation Inherent Resolve" that were designed to re-construct and re-brand al-Qaeda into ISIS in support of Israel, you cannot claim that you do not support the genocide and terrorist attacks in West Asian region whether by ISIS, Israel or al-Qaeda.im british.
So when United States Director of National Intelligence confirms to the congress that they were supporting al-Qaeda in Syria and when Timber Sycamore files proved that with evidence, it is not just proving US was doing it. It also proves the "coalition" that includes England was up to their neck in it. All in support of Israel.
Not to mention that right now your country is one of the main supporters of the terrorist occupiers of Palestine and you have forces there on the ground participating in the genocide in Gaza, in addition to all the weapons, equipment, money, intelligence, ... that you are giving these terrorists.
So in a way, ICC is not finding Israel to be guilty of genocide it is also finding its supporters to be guilty of it as well.
Here's another example: this is YOUR diplomat that YOU elected rubbing shoulders with the new head of al-Qaeda branch and the second in command and a strong believer in and follower of Bin Ladan (the old head of al-Qaeda terrorist group). He is the head of a new terrorist group that was created with the help of NATO in support of Israel to secure the Eastern front (ie. Syria) for the Zionist occupiers of Palestine:
So when you claim you do not support these terrorist groups, you either have to claim you live in a dictatorship where you have no say in what the British regime does, or you have to claim that you are against the British regime. Which is it?
Of course you always choose the third option which is denying everything and sometimes going as far as saying terrorist groups like al-Qaeda aren't even terrorist groups!