Since many of you have taken interest in this, let me elaborate once again in easy terms.
I shared my referral link in a busy public Discord chat regarding crypto gambling. No, I don't control what gets clicked or ignored. That's how public discussions are. I didn't try to micromanage every non-click that isn't how affiliate links work. You share them out, and if someone finds value in the platform, they use it. That's exactly what happened here.
So that's it, you only share there? You try to get into an affiliate activity and you choose to spread your link in one media, only one, and a very busy channel that'll easily drown your chat. Not somewhere more quiet and personal and will bring more permanence like your Instagram, or work colleague? May I ask why?
Is it because you simply just randomly posting, couldn't care less who will use your link as you're not really investing into it?
And regarding how the referral landed on my link you're talking to the wrong person. Ask Betcoin. They're the ones who tracked the user and claim to know so much. If they have such specific information, then surely they can give what abuse was perpetrated? Because until now, it's just been smoke, jokes, and defamation. Still waiting for real evidence.
That's the problem, acccording to them, it's not discord. Thoughts?
Let's take a step back here.
Why am I being cross-examined in detail when I'm the one being accused? I'm not the casino. I don't have click logs, user tracking software, or IP records. Betcoin does.
They're the ones who are making the following accusations:
My referral is "abusive"
I'm somehow connected with that player
I'm trying some kind of scam
Okay. Then prove it.
Not with jokes. Not with sweepstakes posts making fun of my username.
With evidence.
Instead of answering the many obvious and direct questions others have asked (including calls to explain what specific "abuse" took place), Betcoin just keeps throwing out more insults, evasions, and distractions. They had no issue with the click and paying the affiliate commission until after did they reverse it and try to spin the story around.
So why is the defendant being asked to disprove something the accuser won't even define?
Until they can produce actual proof of abuse not just vague claims and deflection this is a case of wrongful seizure and public slander, as clear as day.
I'm happy to discuss, but only if the same degree of scrutiny is applied to Betcoin, not just me.