So from that statement alone, it's not like the next MicroStrategy, it's just like the next BitGo or even the next Binance minus trading. And with license or regulated permits (different from Binance).
So, not a stacker. But doing all the things a finance company does, but I guess using BTC as a backing?
You completely misunderstood what this is about. It's a Strategy
BTC copy but try to have a better strategy, or at least that's how they sell it (
I don't believe it).
The base will be the 42,000 bitcoins that they will have at the beginning and those that they will be acquiring. From there they will offer products such as convertible debt, shares and other products, as Strategy
BTC does.
What I am curious to see is if Mallers, with the background they have with LN will bring out new products, which Strategy
BTC does not have, based on LN.
It's hard to understand these types of companies for the average person.
You don't believe what? That TwentyOne Capital could actually do a better execution on their Bitcoin purchasing strategy than Saylor? That's going to be VERY laughable! Saylor definitely has one of the worst executions for an institutional asset buyer in crypto. Every time Strategy buys, it always marks the local top.

Perhaps someone should tell them to use limit orders for better fills and better price entries.
As is your practice, you seem distracted and diluted Wind_FURY. You seem to want to proclaim that you have better ideas than Saylor, and surely you don't. Cost per BTC is not the ONLY way to figure out performance and/or strategies, whether we are talking on the individual level or institutions and/or governments.
Of course, individuals have to be more careful in regards to how they use debt and/or leverage, yet they still may be advantaged to continue to buy bitcoin at higher prices and not waiting for dips that may or may not end up happening.
Another thing is that if capital comes available when BTC prices are higher, such as Saylor/MSTR's stock prices are higher at that time, then he takes advantage of the momentum of us stock that makes more cash to come available when MSTR stock values (and/or other ways of valuating his company and/or assets are up, rather than down).
You can naysay on Saylor and MSTR all that you want, but you really look like the ignorant one when you are proclaiming that he does not know what he is doing based on his buying BTC at high prices rather than "waiting for the dip." Dips that might not happen.
Sure, Saylor's situation is different as an institution, and surely I would not recommend that individuals need to employ such levels of leverage and/or even investing beyond 25% of their income, yet individuals do not have access to such credit lines like Saylor and Saylor/MSTR has various kinds of cashflows (and emergency funds) beyond their software business.
I would say that you, Wind_FURY, have some of the similar dumb ideas when it comes to individual accumulation of bitcoin, and surely you have biases in your head about needs to wait for dips prior to buying. Remember in mid-to-late 2023 when the BTC prices were bouncing between $25k and $32k and you were so worked up about NOT buying and waiting for BTC prices to go back down into the lower $20ks and even perhaps returning back below $20k, which was quite retarded when we consider that the 200-WMA was then in the $27k arena, and you were wanting more of a discount than what already existed because you were proclaiming that poor people need to get a better discount and blah blah blah,... having fun staying poor because you are too busy waiting for dips that may well end up not happening. Hopefully, no one followed your 2023 waiting recommendations, especially if they ar in their accumulation stage including if they were either low coiners and/or no coiners.
You don't believe what?
I don't believe how poor your reading skills are.
Another good point.

That TwentyOne Capital could actually do a better execution on their Bitcoin purchasing strategy than Saylor? That's going to be VERY laughable! Saylor definitely has one of the worst executions for an institutional asset buyer in crypto. Every time Strategy buys, it always marks the local top.

The best thing about the ridicule you just made is that you put it in writing.
To some extent, it is amazing that someone who has supposedly been accumulating bitcoin since 2016 and supposedly studying bitcoin still has not figured out some of the basics of bitcoin, and the fact that Saylor/MSTR is engaging upon various attempts to leverage upon dollar debasement and/or even the hype of market movements in which more debt comes available based on UPPity price momentum that is a combination of BTC uppity momentum but also their company stocks going up at the same time at even a greater rate. But yeah, Wind_FURY is not going to be fooled by any of those artificialities, since Wind_FURY is smarter than Saylor/MSTR and has some profound insights in regards to basic principles of "buying the dip," that he would like to share about his level of smartness.
Perhaps someone should tell them to use limit orders for better fills and better price entries.
MSTR uses trading bots with limit orders but you continue to make a fool of yourself.
I am sure that Saylor/MSTR has been learning a variety of techniques in their years of buying bitcoin, including how they report their BTC buys, and from time to time, Saylor even talks about some of their buying techniques, including how amazing he found it that he/MSTR could buy millions of dollars of bitcoin without moving the price, which showed it's 2020 liquidity, and surely I would imagine that bitcoin has become even more liquid in the subsequent nearly 5 years later.