Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Second chance for mixers?
by
m2017
on 07/05/2025, 07:22:17 UTC
People who don’t desire anything beyond a normal, ordinary life, in my opinion, don’t even think about things like cryptocurrency mixers.
Here I categorically disagree. Every bitcoiner should think about BTC-mixers. Why? Because of the pseudo-anonymous nature of this asset. If you have somehow shown your btc-address, then for the purposes of, first of all, your own safety, you can't use it in the future. Because anyone, absolutely anyone, will be able to track the history of your transactions (with the possibility of using it to your detriment). You don't show your bank deposit at every step and don't provide bank transactions to everyone you meet, right? This is where mixers come to the rescue. Mixers are not a tool for criminal activities, but a tool for preserving your privacy, which everyone has the right to.

Such anti-mixer—and more broadly, anti-cryptocurrency—propaganda isn’t narrowly targeted to create a negative perception specifically of mixers. It’s designed to establish a general negative view of the entire crypto space. Today, someone hears about the dangers of mixers, tomorrow they hear about someone’s Bitcoin wallet getting hacked, and the day after that, they’ll steer clear of the crypto world altogether.
It is correctly stated here that this is anti-cryptocurrency propaganda that affects mixers.

A regulator that is unable to control bitcoin\mixers is trying to "secure and protect" its subordinates citizens from this. Smiley And "demonization" is actively used here.