it means exactly that, other casinos provide evidence to AskGamblers all the time without it being detrimental to their service, why can't you?
maybe you showed them nothing because you have nothing to show.
We have sent them the proof which we have and which is solid, but for one reason or another they have deemed it to be insufficient. We cannot control their actions unfortunately.
if you have actually provided them with solid proof, they would have accepted it and ruled in your favor.
no one is taking your words over AG, they have a proven track record, you don't.
Well, I have to say I agree with the argument presented by @Zwei.
It is better if betpanda.io at least posts the proof of conversation between their sportsbook provider and them where that service provider had actually raised concerns regarding the OP's behavior.I will wait for some time and give them a neutral which will change to negative as I did in Rollbit's case. These two cases are similar, if you have a mutually agreed third-party mediator, you are kind of bound by the ruling.