Re: DT1 and DT2 members who have negative feedback (or are banned)
⭐ Merited by babo (1)
I actually want to apologize to babo. I had no idea bringing this up would cause any sort of drama. Since the account he left the red trust on has been inactive since 2021, the action of leaving the trust was harmless either way. It just caught my eye because a new entry appeared on LoyceV's list maintained in this thread. Anyway, I'm glad the situation has now been resolved.
In regards to my last post, modern investigations techniques have changed so much - I could never be a detective today. I've always known I have impulse controls, but as long as I didn't leave questionable trust in the moment, I felt OK. There is nothing wrong with an occasional show of consequence to maintain the rules, and I left that feedback knowing it would probably lead to the feedback removal and an apology not to do it again. That indeed was the result and I don't think anyone will try that again (soon).
I want to apologize to examplens and nutildah - it was my action that caused babo's reaction. I also want to apologize to Lillominato89, who was defending his friend that should not have needed to be defended.
Long story short - things have changed and I'm able to move on to Project Development. I will still watch for scams and leave appropriate trust, but I will no longer assume trust is needed until it has been investigated. That was the cause of all this; if I am too lazy to investigate or verify, I should not be picking and choosing examples. I should also not assume everyone will react as I expect. Sorry babo.
Yeah, Babo didn’t need to be defended by me, but friends are friends.
The most important thing is that the situation has returned to a peaceful state, and I’m glad you were able to own up to your mistakes.
Alright guys, now all that’s left is to share a virtual beer together and put this whole thing behind you.