We choose maybe 20 countries or Less but not more wich is high society wages good and all good.
And rest of the world own nothing and all the wealth go to these.
We can't save all or keep all happy atleast we choose few nations make them live good and rest of the world only will work for them.
Look now UK USA canada they not safe anymore people struggle.....crimes and poverty..... We just need to make few nations rich and most part just working for them so we can provide for UK USA canada people sercurity and good food and good life again without even people working in there like it use to be this will keep safe again those.
I dont know on where you do get this idea or these things in mind is that these places that you had mentioned are the ones who do made out some benefit that comes from other countries? I dont know on where you do get your economics class or where you do able to learn it out. Come to think that we do have those first to third rate countries on which basing up economic and development of course, but it doesnt mean that all of them are putting up single place when it comes to benefits and other correlated aspects. Economic approach will be there but it will be totally depending on a certain country in the end of the day. If you do find yourself struggling basing up on what your country do have in terms of crime,poverty and other economic related problems then you shouldnt be putting up all the blame about those countries that on sitting on first tier ones. They have nothing to do with your current suffering or simply its not that relevant at all or simply its just that a very wrong mindset or belief in mind.
If you've been struggling with poverty, instead on trying out to rely with those government actions or other correlated programs or whatsoever. Why you cant just that simply move yourself or taking up some relevant actions on which it would help you out on getting yourself to solve on what are the current problems you do have. Its better not to make yourself that being stressed on whats currently happening in terms of economical approach.
No one is blaming Tier 1 countries for crime or laziness. What is being talked about is structural leverage, which includes how trade policies, financial hegemony, and old debt traps affect outcomes. Poor people don't do anything, right? Then why does capital flow uphill. Why do IMF budget plans hurt healthcare in emerging countries while tax havens grow? Being poor isn't always connected to laziness. You think migration or hustle solves inequality? Try telling that to a Cambodian working-class person or a Zimbabwean under IMF-debt conditioning
Yes, move around and do something. Yes, personal effort matters. But so do trade imbalances, geopolitical power, capital flows, patent law, and institutions that were built during colonialism. Human agency is significant, but it isn't independent. Asymmetry that is built into the structure can't be fixed by hand. Individual accountability does not always defeat global planning. Solve your problems, yes, but those problems are not always born at home