and thirteen people were martyred, thirty-five were injured, and two are missing
Masjid Subhaan
Masjid Bilal
Masjid Abbass
Masjid Um-ul-Kura
village Kotli Loharan
This says a lot about the "Western camp" when every regime that is defined in it, from US itself all the way to India, openly and shamelessly attacks civilian targets on this scale.
Western countries represent various aspects of democratic, human rights and civilization as if they always want the welfare of the people. But behind the mask, there is a different purpose. They themselves take the lives of civilians. They attack without any evaluation of the lives of civilians.
This is not a fabrication. If we know about some of the incidents that have happened, then we can understand very well how they violate the laws of the land and kill civilians. We have already seen how the United States attacked Iraq based on intelligence information only. It was claimed that there were weapons in Iraq that were a threat to the people, that is why they attacked there and killed millions of civilians. But their idea was wrong, there were no such weapons which is proved. What can be called their behavior like this?
The United States has also killed a lot of civilians in Afghanistan. They are just exposing their crimes to the public with a label.
Another unwanted situation is going on in Gaza and Palestine. Israel has been targeting civilians. Numerous women and children have been killed and it is going on.
India's position in Kashmir is another instance. India has surrounded the entire Kashmir with its army. As people, they are living a completely subjugated life. They are being oppressed and tortured even though they are unable to exercise their rights. The Kashmir region was a Special status but India revoked that status in 2019 and is suppressing them in various ways. But the Western countries are only watching them. The main thing is that they have even inspired India to create that situation.
Considering the above points, it would not be wrong to say that in the world, the way they talk about justice or democracy, in reality they are breaking the law. In such a situation, people no longer trust them, which is why countries are now trying to survive by using their strength alone. However, if such behavior is called humanitarian, then it no longer makes sense.
Indeed, the U.S. lied about having WMD in Iraq, attacked weddings in Afgha with drones, and called civilian deaths "collateral". Indeed, Israel's operation in Gaza has killed too many people. Yes, India's attack in Kashmir is an example of how security is valued over agreement in government. Every "imperial" power in history has said it was protecting culture while changing the world to fit its own needs. What's different today? We see it in real-time, and still choose who we believe
However, beware of confusing hypocrisy with singularity. Russia, China, Iran, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia all have no moral compass; they just use different PR terms. Civilization is a costume. Strength is the money. And morality is just the wrapping paper we argue over while the deals happen behind closed doors