if are you talking about the old LoyceV, he is no more, RIP.
BitcoinGirl.Club has fallen from DT1 (Strength 9)
1.5 years ago to DT1 (Strength -8)
now. If the whole world seems to be against you,
chances are the problem is you.The problem is,
I am not a part of a gang. I do things alone, do whatever I think is good for the community, not driven my anything else. Thank you because it surprised me when I realized the -8 strength from +9 strength [I usually do not often see how I am doing at DT and my feedback page, these are not a major priority, I am not in this forum to gain power and bully with the earned power.].
I had to see what was the major blow that caused
the mass exclusion [Data updated on 20th April 2024] and found out it was the stance that I made which exposed a part of the code of the mixer Jambler.
The Code was enough to show[1] [
2] that Jambler was advertising them as a mixing software [deceiving the spirit of
mixers ban by theymos ] but in the core,
Jambler itself is a mixing machine. hugeblack merited my posts. I can not remember how Royce got involved with it too.
Theymos realized his mistake and banned Jambler that effected icopress. There are no doubt that icopresss convinced his campaign members who were promoting Jambler that it's not a mixer but a mixing software with all BS. It was paying well so for them having working in Jambler campaign was profitable. Since icopress was their leader, convinced all, was the mastermind, he camewith a legendary statement after suspending the campaign.
Friends, the campaign is likely to be suspended soon, for this you can thank Royce, BitcoinGirl.Club and hugeblack, who have been working hard over the past few days
I found out that there is already
a topic about this mass exclusion.
Now let's check who were the member of this mass exclusion:
1. NEW cygan (Trust: +58 / =1 / -0) (6646 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. NEW Timelord2067 (Trust: +20 / =15 / -0) (DT1 (-12) 1216 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. NEW NeuroticFish (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 5348 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. NEW jayce (Trust: +27 / =1 / -0) (501 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. NEW TryNinja (Trust: +9 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 6456 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. NEW Hhampuz (Trust: +133 / =4 / -0) (5410 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. NEW Trofo (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 2422 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. NEW icopress (Trust: +56 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (24) 7751 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. NEW 1miau (Trust: +3 / =3 / -0) (6677 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. NEW BlackHatCoiner (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (4) 7233 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. NEW paid2 (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1984 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. NEW apogio (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
I can not be sure about Timelord2067, jayce, 1miau but Hhampuz was looking for an opportunity to ~me because he was annoyed with me. I was calling out Rollbit in many occasions for different scam accusations against Rollbit, I even denied to join Champions League Prediction pool because Rollbit was the sponsor. I can not remember why Trofo acted the same as the others. paid2 and apogio seems minions of icopress. The rest were campaign participants and were led by their financial damage that cause by banning Jambler.
There were more in the following weeks: stompix, cryptofrka [obviously he must have the same reason as Trofo], notblox1 [I am sure we had disagreements even before]. It seems the wave of exclusions continued for the next a few days.

Yes, there is the problem, when you are alone and there are people who works in groups. It's one vs many.
You are no different than those of the members. You are driven by your own interest. I don't expect any better from you anymore, you are sold, compromised [at-least that innocent mind you had, has gone]. You still failed to answer my only question that I left for you but gave many attempts to divert everything towards other directions just because you will have to admit that Vod's red tag is not endorsed by you that it was an abuse and a misuse of feedback practice.