I personally believe that a person starts to have more flexibility in regards to managing his holdings once he reaches overaccumulation status, and a person does not reach such status in order to fall out of it, but instead to stay in such overaccumulation status, so then he would be able to start to sell small amounts of BTC, but still staying in overaccumulation status.. so he might start with
price based sustainable withdrawal before he moves into time-based sustainable withdrawal, yet being in overaccumulatoin status provides options regarding how to mange BTC holdings and the extent to which to stop accumulating and/or to start to sell whether price based or time based.
Okay I think u understand your perspective on overaccumulation.
What about looking at it from this angle. The over there means you have gone past your limit.
Limit here to me isn't goal since goals tend to be refreshed.
Humans are insatiable so when they hit a goal they may push for another as long as its within the range of possibilities.
What am trying to say is,
I think overaccumulating is getting more than you can afford to have. Say accumulation > Capacity.
Let's use this scenario
Say A cup and is been filled with water. When it gets overfulled any other addition becomes a waste except the cup capacity is increased or another is added to collect the excess.
Snip.
We usually invest in Bitcoin because we believe it will last for a long time, but other people may not believe it because they have doubts.
So to remove this doubt, we will basically continue this Bitcoin investment for a long time, because if we invest in front of each other, they will definitely believe it.Of course anyone who invest in Bitcoin does that because they believe in Bitcoin, even though not everyone has same believe despite investing. But I was expecting a kind of you saying that to remove doubt, a person who hardly believe in Bitcoin should continue investing for long, maybe in a long run they will have a good reason to believe in Bitcoin investment after many circle covered and Bitcoin has surege high from the time they could have bought it. Than saying that
if we invest in front of each other, they will definitely believe it. Because surely I don't know what that means.
Those who do not know about Bitcoin may deposit money in the bank,
That is a wrong narrative or impression. Not investing in Bitcoin but rather keeping money in the bank does not show a sign of ignorant or not knowing about Bitcoin. Because surely investors invest in Bitcoin and still have their discretion fund in the bank. Or where do you think discretion fund comes from?
but the owner of that money is a third party, but if you deposit money in Bitcoin, you own this asset yourself.
Yes I agree with you that saving money in the bank makes the bank a third party over your money, but however we can not do without bank or the traditional financial system. What I can only tell you is never to keep all your fund in the bank.