LOL, OP you have opened a new thread to vent out again against casinos 
. I remember when you stretched one simple issue so far previously against a reputed casino that they told you clearly that they do not want you on their platform. You started this OP with exactly the same background. I have to say that you have overgeneralized things too much.
You have to understand one thing: no scalable business can operate on a case-to-case (individual) basis. They have to take a utilitarian view (maximum happiness for the maximum number of people). For example, in your case, the casino has a policy to not use KYC except in suspicious cases as it caters to the demand of a wider audience compared to some individuals who want to verify without even placing a bet.
. I remember when you stretched one simple issue so far previously against a reputed casino that they told you clearly that they do not want you on their platform. You started this OP with exactly the same background. I have to say that you have overgeneralized things too much.You have to understand one thing: no scalable business can operate on a case-to-case (individual) basis. They have to take a utilitarian view (maximum happiness for the maximum number of people). For example, in your case, the casino has a policy to not use KYC except in suspicious cases as it caters to the demand of a wider audience compared to some individuals who want to verify without even placing a bet.
I spent a lot of time to convey to you the real situation. But you just tie everything to a specific case... I did not demand mandatory verification of each participant! I only pointed out that the casino's refusal to ask the client to verify his account is bad form and should lower the casino's rating very much! Do you understand the difference???
The casino has a rating. And it is influenced by various factors. My message on this forum is to convey from inexperienced community members how the casino cheats them even before the game starts! So if the client wants to get verification before the game starts, then the casino is obliged to do it! If the casino refuses, then this should lower the casino's rating! And I do not demand mandatory verification of each player at all, but there is not a single casino without verification (except for outright scam casinos)! And if you are promised that there will be no verification - this is an outright deception! Also, if the casino itself requires verification before starting the game, it is honest and respectable!
And please do not think that I came to someone else's business and started telling them how to work. If you have your own casino, you can do whatever you want, but you should know that your rating will be very low if you do not follow the basic rules of fair play!
Specifically, this topic is related to another fraud - confiscation of winnings due to suspicion of arbitrage bets.
There is no unfair play in these bets. I described above that the same bet on the same outcome but made at different times can be arbitrage or not arbitrage!
Therefore, if you see that a bookmaker confiscates a client's winnings based on arbitrage bets, you must clearly understand - this bookmaker is engaged in fraud!
And I would really like a truly knowledgeable person to write an answer to my question - how can I document each of my bets that it is not arbitration? What if a bookmaker accuses me of arbitration and confiscates my money, and in response I send him a lawsuit with evidence that each of my bets was 100% not arbitration!!! How to prove this? And if you do not have an answer, then this topic is 100% in the dark zone, the zone where the bookmaker steals money without proof! This means that this behavior must be harshly condemned by the entire community and, naturally, greatly lower the casino rating!!!
We are not naming specific names or cases now. I want the community to form the correct view of reality!