The tongue of this here bot is twisted because the cat has it (in part).


If we refer to sats, then a billion start 10 bitcoin, and so billions would be 20 bitcoin or more.  It seems that I had this dilemma before in regards to what is the difference between millionaire and multi-millionaire, and I could not exactly decide the definition.

In bitcoin, we could have some mili-sats, even thought there remains some controversy about them as a unit even though they have been used on lighting network.

Another thing is that we do not necessarily need to have "billions and billions" of our own in order to talk about or refer to "billions and billions" that exist as a topic that has become increasingly relevant to replace the topic of "millions and millions," which used to be a BIG thing (or at least all of the rage of days gone by).


I am about to vomit.

If that is possible?


Down before up?

I have heard that somewhere before.

Down before up does not always work out too well.. even though it sounds good in theory.


Bitcoin is already the king.


We are already in a bullrun since November 2022, even though we might not have had realized it until either mid or late 2023.


Are those people in the room with us, now?


I frequently like to talk about how bitcoin might be able to replace salary, even though it could take 4-10 years or longer, unless a guy is able to front load his investment into bitcoin.


Sure, we can measure bitcoin against the S&P 500, yet the S&P 500 seems to have a lot of perversion within it based on dollar debt, and bitcoin is likely a hedge against various dollar-based systems, even though frequently bitcoin will also move in short term correlation with dollar liquidity, yet at the same time, bitcoin does have the unfair advantage of being in its earliest of times of adoption, so in that regard, bitcoin's price performance is going to continue to greatly outperform the S&P 500 - especially with from time to time outbursts to the upside.  So hopefully you are not overly distracted by the S&P 500 or other traditional financial indictors that are greatly perverted by dollar debt systems.


I don't know this reference point. 


I would think in any conversation, there are going to be guys with greater or worse insight, and many of us got started in bitcoin with ONLY focusing on number go up aspects, and surely bitcoin continues to have that number go up angle of relating to bitcoin's essence (even though sure, there is more to bitcoin than merely number go up)....   I suppose that many of us stay in bitcoin, too, because we expect number to continue to go up, otherwise, it would not be a very wise place to keep decent portions of value as well as spending our time and energies in a bitcoin direction.


Have you ever heard of "headlights?" or does that ONLY happen during cold weather? asking for a friend.


That is a reasonably good point [size4pt]that OgNasty finally made[/size]..