Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: Holydarkness and Casino Disputes—Something’s Fishy
by
CharlieSheen99
on 15/05/2025, 13:37:32 UTC
This guy is obviously in the casino's side. No matter what casinos does. Betpanda acuses people of doing fraud, therefore they steal all the money and deposits. They don't show absolutely any proof. Just accuse someone of doing fraud and take all the funds. And you will see our friend Holydarkness defending them. The guy is a fraud himself.
He is on the side of what’s right, whether the right is with the players or the casinos. He's a neutral person and does not get paid for trying to help with the issues of casino players, as long as they haven’t violated the policies of the casino they play on. If someone violates the casino's policies or rules, or is a cheater player, he bears his own responsibility.

I've known him for years, and he's not a fraud. Anyone who calls him that is completely wrong. What he does should be appreciated, not accused without evidence. Our friend doesn't side with casinos; fraudulent casinos, he doesn't hesitate to call them a fraud. He is a person with a good reputation, and your opinion should be kept to yourself. If you don’t like what Holy is doing, then you can simply solve your problems on your own without anyone’s help.

I am not the only one that think so. Various people think the same. Do you see any other thread putting in the knowledge of the community that an user is working on the bookmaker's side?
This is very simple. This guy is defending that a bookmaker can STEAL the money and deposits of a client, just because THEY SAY without any proof, that the client is commiting fraud.
This is very simple to understand, if the guy defend this point of view, he is in the bookmaker side, if he changes is mind and recognize that a bookmaker CANNOT STEAL the money of a client without any proof of nothing, I will change my mind about him. But he will not do it. Very simple to understand.