Have you ever tried keeping a record to compare the two? And what did you find, which one’s actually more profitable?
It’s easier to pick which team will win, so most people go for the moneyline. But the odds can kill your profit, since the favorites usually have really low payouts. So then you start thinking about betting on the point spread, where the payout is more balanced.
But are we really doing that kind of comparison? Or are we just betting based on gut feeling following our instincts without even knowing if we’re actually winning in the long run?
Basically for me as a gambler, I can confidently say that I usually don't do any kind of comparison on whatever previous patterns I may have used while gambling, but what I do is rather book my bets base on the outcome of the previous performance between both clubs, and accepting my fate, knowing fully well that gambling is both a game of skill and luck. However, I think Point Spread seems to be the most profitable pattern of Sport betting, since it always has a significant high odds as compared to mere placing a bet on the Moneyline pattern of Sport betting, which usually doesn't always end as predicted. Because by applying the Point Spread pattern of gambling such as gambling on a certain amount of goals expected to be scored, corners, shots on target or cards, it's chance of success is always high as compared to just placing a bet on either home or away team to score.