It wAs gold b4 but gold is old old School people buying narrative that during or pre-wars Crisis to get gold.
But bitcoin is new gold and it's a war currency.
To move wealth store and pay exchange during the war
You don’t need attribute bitcoin to negativity before people will tell on whether they should embrace it or not. Before Bitcoin, other assets have been used to fund war through their own ways. Bitcoin may be used for that purpose but was never intended for that, it is the people’s will which differs from all of us. When actually showing and telling the disadvantage on something, also show the advantages for comparison sake. If the advantages overwhelm the disadvantages then, you should be able to tell if the asset is worthy of being ventured into or not. Bitcoin is beyond just the negative attribution you’re describing it for, it his already gaining acceptance globally, that enough makes it a better choice for monetary purpose than any other asset you can think of.