To be honest I have no idea why did he decide to seat next to each other. You have to ask popek1990. Yes and definitely it helps a lot when someone knows more then 2 cards in his case 6 cards out of 12 cards which is huge. In poker blockers are big part of the game.
All I wanted to clarify that SWC refund me the lost amount in this game and didn't confiscate the money for themself.
Regarding showing the hand history, from my experience most of the sites when there is collusion, they don't make the hand history public. So it is up to SWC if they want to do that.
Again for me it was pretty obvious the collusion, similar style, weird hands, tanking and new accounts(in SWC poker you can actually see when someone just created an account on their screenname)
Yeah I know how swc work, I am a high krill level myself for many years. Of the "regulars" participating in those hands I only know Billyswords. Yet, I have mentioned the hands in question that OP posted, these are fairly normal hands as mentioned, where all the money goes in most likely anyway.
And like I said, I have had my fair share of spotting collusion as well and I have NEVER been refunded, yet I was even kicked out of the telegram group just to mention that. So it's understandable when i have some doubts of what SWC is saying here since I don't deem them trustworthy.
By the way, even if lost funds were refunded (I bet they didn't refund the rake), what happened to the initial buyins of the accused accounts? I guess we all know where that went.
Anyway, enough of that SWC nonsense, I will stay out of the discussion from now on. I don't trust them one bit, not only for the way they treated me, also for how they treat people in this forum.