Let me start from the bottom to the top:
I don't need to join that thread because I am aware of what you are trying to do (which is completely different from what CG did) and I'd be happy to dissect this matter in a whole, so yeah: we can go as deep as you like and whether or not you decide you'll help or not, it won't change the fact that I only have positive overview of your attempt to help others and me.
Now to get back to the matter, and I'll go through the timeline, so I can explain situation better for both you and others looking at this thread:
- My account was frozen (I could login and play, but couldn't withdraw money) by bc.game. Stopped playing immediately
- I contacted them via Live chat, they requested additional KYC, even though I was already Advanced KYC verified. I provided that to them.
- After several days, they informed me that I was in a breach of their ToS: multiple accounts, self-referral and "their right to close my account at any time".
- Followed up with them through several e-mails telling them that I did not have any double account, asked them to provide me information in regards to those double accounts just so I can be sure there was an actual reason for banning. No response, just same old, templated e-mail.
- Contacted them several times again, with either no response, or delayed (2 weeks after) with again, same old, templated e-mail (contact that was respoding to me was Ivan).
- I've started writing on X, looking for other ways to reach them out: "The Castle" Discord, Spyds (some guy that was already claiming they were scams) and after several attempts to reach them out, no luck.
- Started public campaign (with Spyds) on X, while simultaneously talking to the legal representative (Roelof Bijkerk) on moving this case legally.
- Signed contract with mr Bijkerk, who sent demand letter to BC game, GCB and Central bank of Curacao. They never responded to demand letter sent on my behalf or any other that lawyer previously wrote to them
- After several follow ups, mr Bijkerk wrote one last follow up before filing them up for bankruptcy. Reason for that: during the bankruptcy proceeding, defendant needs to provide security in regards to claims for ongoing cases against them. As it was north of $2.1m (several claims), his strategy was that either they will start talking to him (lawyer) or they will have to go to court with security note (bank guarantee that there are funds to settle claims).
- After bankruptcy hearing was filed, and up until 48 hours before hearing was scheduled, there was no evidence against me or any other player. 48 hours before hearing, defendant's lawyer (Zahavi) filed production on their behalf with zero viable evidence.
- October 4th, 2024 was first hearing, to which initial court decision was: there are disputes on those claims, which means that both parties should settle the claim in "good faith". BC.game Jack sent e-mail to our lawyer initiating contact, but after lawyer replied, he never reached back.
- Lawyer files to the Court of Appeal same bankruptcy hearing stating that there was no successful contact between. That's when second hearing went (most of the documents, excluding demand letter, I've already sent).
- Gaming Control Board is jumping in action, and revoking their license
- Considering they refused to provide guarantee note from the bank (which in any legal terms, they are not liquid), Court of Appeal declared them bankrupt and assign bankruptcy trustee (representative who will ensure that all claims are attended and if there is successful liquidation, claimants get funds disbursed as per laws.
At this point, trustee (Nagelmakers) reviews all the players' claims against BC.game and decide that all of those are valid (as there was insufficient evidence from BC.game) and that in terms of successful liquidation, all players will be provided with the funds they were owed to.
So, in essence, what happened here:
- At any given point in time, before or after legal case against BC.game (Small House and Blockdance) they have provided sufficient (or any) evidence of players breaking their terms of service. Everything was hearsay.
- In between filing for bankruptcy and hearings, they even started "fabricating" evidence by creating another page that says "Small House is not liable for all those claims, but Blockdance is due to acquisition". At any given point, nor our lawyer nor the court have seen actual Purchase Agreement of said acquisition nor that acquisition ever happened (one of the call records you've heard was acquired through the legal means just to support this).
- They have failed to even engage in actual legal battle with players by simply funding bank account in Curacao and providing bank guarantee note that says "we have $2.X million funds secured in case all claims are valid". - Thus far, I can only assume that they never had any evidence of any wrongdoing.
- They fleed jurisdiction by acquiring "Anjouan" license and creating another legal entity in Belize.
Now, to get back to the CG case:
- At any given point in my complaint in CG, I have ever been introduced with any evidence showing I actually had any double account. It was only "hearsay" by Branislav and CG team, so I am certain that BC game fabricated that evidence.
- Several times, they've said that I was actually breaking their Terms of Service by having double account, even accusing me of connecting via VPN. I never did that. Unless Cloudflare CDN (1.1.1.1) is a VPN. Provided that information in case.
- Tried to the best of my effort to provide every piece of evidence to them and not seeing a single evidence back. As you may also see, BC.game never actually engaged in conversation directly, only CG did.
I understand that this whole story still have some doubts, and I'm happy with you looking at the other side of the story, but rest assured that I have never had any double account or used one, except the one only created by the minor technical bug I already explained.
Furthermore, I am happy to provide all the email correspondence with my lawyer, which also contains bulletproof evidence of them going above and beyond to act in fraudulent matter, but considering this is story of my claim of $1.5m, won't do that publicly.
So please, go ahead and talk to your contact, and for any evidence that your contact passes on, feel free to share them publicly (or even ask them to engage).
I have no other mission than to get ahold of my funds, and if that's going to take another legal battle in Belize, I'm all for it. For now, I'll remain trying to sort this through here, as this is also way for me to publicly disclose what has been done so far to me (and others).
Hope you can shed some clarity on this by reaching out to your contact.
Cheers!