Your edit does not really help.

I frequently suggest that if anyone is going to invest in shitcoins that they should limit such investment to 10% the size of their bitcoin investment.

Sure, it is difficult to consider anyone really "investing into shitcoins" since they are something that you would most likely want to get in and out of, so it is more like a trade and you have to figure when you are going to get out, and yeah, in the short term any shitcoin can perform better than bitcoin, yet there is none that is worthy of investing, so that is why I personally suggest no more than 10% put into shitcoins, which largely is for those guys who cannot resist gambling.

Shitcoins are off topic here anyhow, so it is strange that you want to pump any particular one to suggest that some shitcoins might be less shitty than other shitcoins... and yeah, Ethereum has been brainwashing normie newbies for a long time, and so if you believe that its demise in price over the past 3 years is just a coincidence?  That piece of shit was overvalued in the first place, and so now you are hoping that it will pump because it has been on a steady downfall for 3 years against bitcoin, so therefore it must pump, right? 

Think about the fairly strong signal that moving over to proof of stake (oh what a coincidence? that happens to have happened 3 years ago, too?) was not exactly a bright move to take away one of the ONLY redeeming attributes that Ethereum used to have (that is proof of work) prior to their promoting and actually following through with their dumbass idea to move to proof of stake.  It is not like that piece of shit does not have other problems related to its convoluted premine and also the inability to actually know how many actual coins had already been issued.


I agree with the overall sentiment, and so I sent an smerit for the idea of the haiku, yet I am not sure if I agree with the "I deserve the loss" part, since sure a lot of people are dumb and gullible, but scammers are becoming more and more sophisticated in appearing as if they are legitimate and take care of certain areas of gullibility that even smart people might fall victim to some or the fairly creative ways of impersonating they are from a place of authority, including that there ends up being a sense of urgency if coins might seem to be vulnerable. 


Link or it didn't happen. 

 

I went to bitstamp.com, and it took me to bitstamp.net, and I don't see anything that resembles your description of a steaming movie.. maybe i missed it?