~Snip
For me it is not too ethical if we sell something that we already have as our long-term assets such as land or other things to be forced to be in bitcoin.
It really depends on your investment approach, sometimes it is still considered better than getting capital from a bank loan or something like that. I tend to sell physical assets to raise capital instead of making loans, especially physical assets that don't have much growth in value and so far I have sold gold to accumulate assets including bitcoin. I don't regret it and so far I've gotten a return from my bitcoin investment, even if gold went high before.
Although it may sound good to some people, for me it is an imposition because in the end we still have several options including getting money that can be set aside to invest without having to sell anything we already have.
If you are sure like that, then don't force it. Gold and land or other physical assets can still be purchased when you get a return from your bitcoin investment. It is true that the price may be higher or change, but bitcoin seems to have a better chance of delivering higher returns than gold or land. I didn't sell all the gold to accumulate bitcoins, but I only sold some, while I still own the gold and bitcoin.
One does not need to force one's will and be too optimistic, but without risk we will never know how sweet the results will be. I took this risk not for no reason, for me the performance of bitcoin so far is still better than other physical assets, in fact I am willing to postpone buying a lot of things because I want to get a good return from bitcoin during its bullish cycle.