Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: no one can beat the casino.
by
wheeljunkie
on 20/05/2025, 00:04:43 UTC
I think everyone has experienced the thought of almost winning, but the thing I'm worried about is when they lose and think like this, plus in the previous gamble they almost got a big win, then this allows the player to gamble again by depositing their money again to gamble again because they think they almost won, so they think in the next gamble they will be able to win, I have also experienced this and it's really sad when I remember it hahaha.
It's true what you said, casinos are built to make money, so the chances of winning that players have cannot be greater than the casino, it's only natural that players experience more losses than wins.
Certainly, that sensation of being so near makes it much more difficult to halt it's as though the mind mislead you into believing the next one will strike since the past one was almost there, I have also been there in those times it is difficult to go. The system is actually designed to keep you in that cycle, Winning seems doable but the house always has the advantage, Knowing that helps even if it,  doesn't always simplify opposition.
There is no such thing as almost winning or being near. This is a flaw in the human perception of gambling. In terms of outcomes there is only lost or won, and the actual probabilities regardless of past outcomes. People should read more instead of just doing things.

I have never made these bets, but from what I have seen and understood, these strategies of increasing the bet after losing seem very risky. It seems like a cycle that is hard to escape and in the end, mathematics and chance always end up against the player. I think overall this shows that there is no magic formula to win these games easily. But I have one question: do you think there is any strategy that actually works in the long run?
This thing should not even be called a strategy and has certainly always led to a negative outcome. If 1 person succeeds with it after 100 000 people lost with it, that makes it a statistical anomaly and not a strategy.