How about they adequately inform themselves first of that which they invest in? Can investors just put money into something they aren't familiar about and complain out of ignorance?

Anyway, let's wait how the court decides on this, but given the current administration's leaning on Bitcoin, this might be trashed. If they succeed, however, perhaps CEOs, bankers, hedge funds managers, wealth advisors, and the like should stop claiming what Bitcoin is: a hedge against fiat devaluation, a store of value, an intergenerational wealth, and so on.