When i said that an investors should invest what he/she can afford, i meant that if any investors that doesn't have steady cashflow and you can sell a land or you have money that you split into two, the other should be the one that you will invest into so i didn't include losing of money in Bitcoin because i know that with dollars cost averaging strategy you will not losing all your money.
And i totally disagree with you when say bitcoin as some sort of gambling that you shouldn't invest what you cannot afford to lose, once you are looking Bitcoin as a gambling believe me that you will not have the mindset to buying Bitcoin aggressively or investing in a long term investment but i want to put it to that with DCA strategy it will help you recover your money, so a really investors will not think of losing but to buy Bitcoin and build up his portfolio.
For me it is not too ethical if we sell something that we already have as our long-term assets such as land or other things to be forced to be in bitcoin. Although it may sound good to some people, for me it is an imposition because in the end we still have several options including getting money that can be set aside to invest without having to sell anything we already have.
Being in bitcoin is indeed very good and indeed there must be something sacrificed in this case such as our grit and confidence that must be maintained and make self-control so that we can reduce our extravagant life a little but it will not be too worth it if we sacrifice what we already have for a long-term process such as selling property or land that we already own.
Indeed, it is allowed because after all it is the choice of each in making a decision but it needs to be emphasized that pushing ourselves too much may not end well later.
Sure. Land is not very liquid, so it could take some planning to sell it, and yeah, if you think that you are being forced to buy bitcoin, then you are thinking about bitcoin wrong - yet at the same time, it is true that the number of early adopters (in the first 15 years of bitcoin's history) were not very many, yet since early 2024, there have been more and more BIGGER players coming into bitcoin and having more ways of getting into bitcoin, including going through ETFs that previously were not available.
At the same time, in the past year (and even less than that), there have been increasing and increasing talks of various governments, institutions and even rich people creating bitcoin reserves, which largely means that there is increasingly more hoarding of bitcoin, so if you are choosing to hoard land that is quite an inferior investment than bitcoin, including that bitcoin is in its early stages of adoption, which contributes to it exponential s-curve adoption that is also likely to be reflected in the price. So sure, do what the fuck you like, including waiting and including staying invested in inferior assets. Those are your choices.
No one is forcing you. You live with the consequences of your decisions and your action, which includes your investments (non-investments) and your allocation choices, and so sure, if you do not have options to invest aggressively into bitcoin, then sure, that is understandable, yet at the same time, there are people who are purposefully failing/refusing to invest into bitcoin and also acting as if land is a superior investment to bitcoin, when it likely is not.
Rightly People who do not have an adequate basic Knowledge are people who will most likely be thinking that investing in land or holding land is more preferable and better than investing in Bitcoin and holding, it has been obvious that land and real estate are not so liquid profit in return of investment comparing to investing in bitcoin, If we should compare people who invested in Bitcoin 10 to 15 years ago and people who also invested in Land and Real Estate in this same year bracket we would definitely learn the difference between them that a Bitcoin investor stands superior to someone who invested in lands.
Now that we have a lot of publicity in Bitcoin as an asset, most governments and wealthy individuals are now interested in adopting Bitcoin as a means of financial exchange, and a National reserve and stock market as well, which Bitcoin was not listed but now it is. This evidently shows the liquidated state of Bitcoin compared to landed properties, it is just our decision-making that is important to see this evidence in place when it comes to investing in Bitcoin and holding for the long term.
At this point, investing in Bitcoin is better and more profitable than investing in Land. I have chosen to invest in Bitcoin and to hodl for the long term instead of holding land and Real Estate, as Bitcoin is Superior for me. Accumulating Bitcoin consistently is the sole Objective. I love the emphasis that you laid out.