It is nice that I make you laugh but what happens here is the opposite, that those hands for someone who doesn't know much about poker may look like collusion but if you know poker you see that they don't prove anything.
Exactly. They don't prove anything, which is why nobody should be supporting OP's flag against SwC. I don't have any problems with your negative trust against them, as its for other reasons. But as far as the flag is concerned, OP didn't really supply enough evidence that contradicts what SwC has to say about the matter. I tend to take their word over OPs, independent of anything outside of this thread.