Probably, for most gamblers who are not addicted, this is not even a trick or strategy, but a standard behavior. In general, using this example, you can see the difference between a healthy person and a patient with gambling addiction. If a person is constantly losing and has lost the entire bankroll, it does not mean that he is addicted. If a person wins (that is, he has achieved his goal) and, nevertheless, continues to play, then, as in the first case, he loses everything, then this person is addicted.
Anyone who has played gambling to the extent that it doesn't know it limits in the gambling, and at the end he or she loses it's money in gambling I think that person is addicted gamblers, so for anyone who is into gambling is supposed to have a limit because if you don't have a limits in gambling you will spend unnecessarily so therefore gambling is something we have to follow with a diplomacy knowing the risk that's involved in the gambling, the risk of gambling is that much and that's why people doesn't know when they bet above their limits, anyone who is a pure gamblers is supposed to have a budget if I'm not mistaken, so that you will not spend your money that is not meant for gambling on the process of betting
It's good that you understand the importance of self-control. However, even those gamblers who are confident that they are in control of themselves sometimes succumb to the temptation to make another bet after winning and lose their winnings as a result (I experienced this a long time ago). By the way, such a phenomenon as "Regression towards the mean" is essentially a scientific explanation (from the point of view of statistics) of why you should be able to stop in time after a big win.