Honestly I'm still trying to really figure out what you insinuating, as well as the message and intention behind what you stated because it doesn’t seem completely clear to me, and if I may relate it with war I don't think it even makes complete sense because Bitcoin is in no way a currency to support or even stand in as an alternate fro currencies in times of war. The only  time I may want to come into some for of agreement is if it's stated that it's a stroe of value just like as it has been with gold a long while ago.

Some years back, during war and crisis most persons do sell off their valuables to get gold because in war and crisis do come with some economic downtime which affects  the value of assets owned by individuals there and so to keep this value they sell off their assets and buy gold which they could later sell off after the crisis and still maintain value for their money of which in some cases they get more. Bitcoin shares similar characteristics in few cases but it's important to know that it's not the basis or grounds upon which the Bitcoin innovation was brought about, rather it came in handy seeing how valuable and sustaining Bitcoin has been over the years.