[edited out]
I think this issue will be more risky because I have always heard from many big investors that one should not borrow money from others to invest or invest outside of one's own interests. Now selling land and investing in Bitcoin may fall into the same category. It is certain that if you keep the land, the price of that land will increase gradually, but if you invest in Bitcoin, especially if you sell land, there is no guarantee that the investor will get a good return on that investment. I think that instead of selling land and investing in Bitcoin, the investor should invest some amount of money continuously depending on his income, so that on the one hand, his land will remain, but he will have a continuous investment. I gave such an opinion from my side, but my opinion may not agree with many, but if I were in my place, I would definitely not sell my land and invest in Bitcoin, but would do something alternative to invest.
You are presuming land to be equal or even a better investment than bitcoin, which truly has not been shown to be true, especially if we look at price performance in the past 10 years. Even though bitcoin is not guaranteed to perform equally to or even better than land, we also should not be blanketedly presuming that land is a better investment.
In the past 10 years, bitcoin has performed around 100x better than land (
about a week ago, I provided a description of the past 10 years). Right now, bitcoin is not showing itself as being overly inflated, and in fact bitcoin is still showing itself to be under appreciated. Land is not completely connected to fiat and debt based bubbles in all parts of the world, yet there are a lot of parts of the world where land is overly inflated, so it is seems quite illogical to blanketedly presume land is better than bitcoin, even if there are likely going to be transaction costs to actually sell land and to buy bitcoin and bitcoin has different risks in terms to how it is stored and perhaps how it is managed to in regards to buying and/or selling it.
It is a bit funny, even on a bitcoin forum, that so many guys automatically presume land to be a better place to hold value, even in spite of the past performance facts.. and yeah, past performance does not guarantee future performance, yet bitcoin's investment thesis is not exactly getting weaker with the passage of time, and there are several ways that bitcoin's investment thesis is getting stronger with the passage of time.