Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
T is a businessman (in the past). He just proposed a "merger", not sure why it was taken so negatively as it was just a suggestion with no aggressive moves to accompany such suggestions.
Strategically, Greenland would be better off with US for obvious reasons [it already had, as was revealed publicly recently, a US nuclear base https://www.wsj.com/world/greenland-us-camp-century-nuclear-base-91e8abea], but politically, I understand why this is not a popular opinion.
Finally, that "agreement" is worth zippo if US really "wanted" Greenland, which it does not, in all seriosness.
So...nothing changes.
I am not sure why yellow pages always write about 'humiliations', 'upsets', etc. when talking about economic relationships.
I found out that British are always very reserved in person and in public, and justly so, but quite outlandish in their writings.
Must be some sort of compensation, indeed.
I'm sure if China talked about offering Hawai or Guam to join the great Chinese nation Trump would take it very well.
Actually, US was more or less silent while China bought control of the Panama canal..now this seems to be reversing, in part.
Anyway, talking about it is just vibration of the air and ink on the pages...there was nothing else done...I mean... militarily, which makes it a non-issue for now, imho.
Long term, if and when Greenland would be largely devoid of ice, it would probably become a point of contention between countries (if it becomes suitable not for 50 thou, but 50-100 mil people).
Greenlanders would not be able to provide such population spike themselves, perhaps, but if Danish could, I would be for it.