Sure, any small amount can end up adding up to a lot of money, but it seems to be a waste of time to be focusing on such small amounts for our base case examples .Sure some guys are going to have to round down their numbers to deal with their own finances, yet practically, I see no reason to be giving examples of $2 per month or $2 per week, even if some guys might ONLY be able to do that amount. You can do what you want and present numbers however you like, but it seems better to be attempting to deal with at least $10 per week as our cases on the lower end of the investment range... for our examples...
though I could imagine how long it will take before they can be able to accumulate half of the value of bitcoin or getting to the status of overaccumulation this will take (probably 50 to hundred years if I'm not mistaken)
I am not suggesting that these guys who can ONLY buy $2 at a time do not invest into bitcoin, yet I am proclaiming that they are special cases and they surely might not even be in a position to figure outsystems in order to manage such small buys, but they still might be advantaged by engaging in such ongoing buys....but like Sim_Card had mentioned in an earlier post, they may well be better off to allow their fiat amount get up to a higher amount before investing, such as $10 or more... .but they can do what they like, and sure, if they are not penalized by fees it still might make sense to ongoingly make such small purchases. I just doubt it is very valuable to be focusing on such cases or referring to examples of guys who have such low levels of discretionary income, including that referring to having $10 per week as a poor person seems to make the point that even the person with $10 per week, they are not going to have a lot of options, but they still may need to trying to build up their bitcoin investment size and their emergency fund at the same time...and still try to employ reasonable and prudent cashflow management practices.
And majority of this guys can give up along the line probably due to old age or the unknown death" and I'm about to agree with you on the fact that investing with $2 seems to be a waste of time because after all the time they have wasted so far and it happens that they couldn't get to the status of overaccumulation, in this case it becomes a waste of time, Now I know that is good to run a race that we know we can easily win.
If you are now forcing me to take the other side of my earlier proposition, even though I never said that anyone should not invest into bitcoin, but instead I said that our examples should be mostly attempting to work towards guys of $10 or more per week as the examples of poor folks instead of giving examples of guys who might ONLY be able to invest $2 per week or $2 per month.
I think that anyone who has a discretionary income can invest into bitcoin, yet surely one of the problems when a person has such a low discretionary income, they may well end up making mistakes in terms of thinking that their $2 is discretionary income, but in the end they are so poor that they actually need that money at a later point.... Each person has to determine the extent that such small investments into bitcoin over a long period of time may well end up advantaging them more than hurting them.. since they do not need to get to overaccumulation status in order to be advantaged by investing into bitcoin, yet it may well be better if they are able to plan to invest 4-10 years or more, other wise if they cannot establish at least a 4-year timeline for their bitcoin investment at the time that they start their bitcoin investment, then they would be trading (and/or gambling) rather than investing, and I personally don't recommend that anyone trades and/or gambles bitcoin, even though surely they are free to do whatever they like with their money.. I just don't recommend trading/gambling bitcoin.