Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: Tail emission ideas that retain the 21 million limit
by
stwenhao
on 27/05/2025, 06:13:42 UTC
⭐ Merited by vapourminer (1)
Quote
how do you know to which miner you're locking the coins to?
You don't. Any miner can claim it later.
You are free to send coins to addresses like bc1qqph8gusf2x7ch4xjs8vnp7hy449r929wnv5jggmy678gam85l6rqgajus9. It has "1000000 OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY OP_DROP OP_TRUE" script, so it can be claimed after a block 1000000 by any miner.

Quote
We'd need a mechanism to lock the coins in a way the coinbase transactions of a block can spend it.
It already exists, and it is called "transaction fee".

Quote
The question would be how the fees can be transferred into a coinbase transaction.
They already are.

Quote
merged mining would be an alternative, but it would disconnect both tokens as they would live on different chains
There are ways to use Merged Mining, without forking the chain. P2Pool did it in the past.

Quote
which could lead into a slow death of the token (see Namecoin)
NameCoin implemented Merged Mining in a wrong way, because it is possible to do 51% attack on NameCoin, even if you cannot do 51% attack on Bitcoin. They should trace the heaviest chain of double SHA-256 headers, and calculate the global difficulty, based on that. Instead, they have their own difficulty, which is one of their mistakes.