Of course I understand the need to cut cost of land acquisition in direct location and perhaps LandDao wants to facilitate the process of investment on land, I really see the necessity, and payment across the international bodies might be a stress for investors and tokenizing the asset is paramount. which is why I see a difference in LandDao RWA intentions.

However, land tenure system in every countries varies, if an investor investments in this Real world asset tokenized land acquisition how sure are we that the governing body of the country will not confiscate the investment because they want to use it? and what assurance do we have if it occurs that will be getting another land or rewards or return this bothered me a lot while reading through the papers of LandDao.