It does have serious consequences for labour. it imo must be paired with significant mitigating measures to peg wages and middle/lower class assets and savings to the impending rise in inflation. Which as an action will actually exacerbate inflation further, requiring you to ultimately backstop your treasury bonds with aggressive tax policy on the rich or as I prefer backing of hard assets like Bitcoin. Bitcoin inflates, it's algorithmic inflation. and it could be outperformed by fiat for over a decade and I'd be still using it. In fact that's what I am explicitly prepared for out of concern for the next blocksize wars a decade+ bear market. 


I haven't heard you come correct here about much. You can identify the abuses of fiat and the use case of protecting yourself from fiat with Bitcoin. That's about the most I can credit you with. We only have a little window into who you are and what you think and to be honest a lot of what you show us is this kind of tantrum about irrelevant things like feelings.

It comes with being right about lots of stuff and having an extremely high degree of confidence in my awareness and intimacy with the context, the BIP processes and the specific BIP you are talking about, the author and their motivations, Bitcoin itself, as well as a fair grasp on the boarding subjects of linguistic language drift and currency denominations. I am arrogant. That's because I'm confident you cannot challenge my argument. And you haven't. You have chosen to focus on your hurt feelings and my refusal to empathize with you.