it's normal for one side to be seen as superior to the other, but in such a controversial match i didn't think psg would be seen as the favorite so much.
i think it's a result of hype. dembele walking to the ballond'or and inter may have been perceived as a team that was beaten in the finals. still, i think this much difference is too much. at least the odds for the draw should have been higher than inter.
betting on both sides seems risky, i think a draw is the best bet here. i see a high chance of extra time.
I think people are prefer with offensive teams.
PSG is always dominating regardless they lose or win, unlike Inter, they didn't dominate on the pitch, but their counter attack brought them to final.
For me PSG vs Inter will be fierce, so betting a draw isn't wrong though.
Inter really can't be underestimated.
This is a treacherous observation because when Inter Milan plays, it possibly doesn't look like they were dominating, but when you watch them closely how they read the game and how they have an impact on what happens next, it's kind of wrong to say that they are not dominating at all. It is a very different type of dominance that they have over a game.
Let me put it like this, if a football fan does not watch games everyday or weekend, PSG football is the type you want to see and you understand because they go and go and go. Inter Milan is more difficult to understand. They have a very disciplined approach on the pitch and they intentionally give the other teams some room to play, but only room that is hardly dangerous to them. It gives the other teams wrong confidence and then they are good at discovering the one moment they have to move forward quickly and leave their defensive position as a whole team.