If it is safe to assume the evidence BC Game provided you was the same as they sent to CasinoGuru and in all probability they have not been tampered with, what are your opinions on the matter raised in the OP? If you cannot answer right now because you might be in conversation with BC Game it is understandable but sooner or later the OP will hopefully want closure.
I think it's safe to assume that the evidence BC gave to me is the same that BC gave to CG, and they're not tampered in a sense that they manipulate the elements to be in their favor.
My opinion on this topic? I can't say yet, as this thread is designed by OP to address the matters surrounding BC globally. I am yet to touch any aspect pointed in this thread as I'm currently chasing OP's other thread that focused on and limited to his own case with BC. I think I'm very close with the bottom of that thread, just waiting for some posts and reply from both sides as I'm currently doing another double-blind test on them.
I'll move to this thread once I managed to deliver my final findings on the other thread.
You can't say because you are doing their public relations for them.
The unbiased opinion that bc.game is a fraudulent casino that is using sophisticated legal tactics to scam unsuspecting players and to escape any legal prosecution, and are taking advantage of players who do not create a scam accusation thread in this forum.
I tried to tell you that you are wrapped up in helping a fraudulent casino and yet you continue to be a "free" PR rep for them. Though, I still maintain my opinion that you receive some for of favoring or compensation for work, considering you refuse to explicitly deny that you benefit in any way whatsoever for acting on their behalf as a PR rep.