However, my concerns are you subjective classification of quality post, some times I make good and appreciable post in just two to three line and sometimes I write walls of text. It's very difficult to understand your perspective of quality post.
A one liner direct quality post is worth more than a wall of text with repetitive words. Quality is not by the length of a post but the value it gives.
You are very correct on this sir, more quality is needed than quantity, but the major problem is that some of our guys that are in most campaign, post like that wouldn't be counted towards the week payments, and talking about mostly going straight to the point, because their manager is seeing things differently, he want to see that 150 words, that's why most people's post is full of repetition statement.
So in a situation like this, how can we strike a balance or go about it.
I believe a quality post shows itself by the content and not volume. If it is to write in volume to produce the kind of quality content you want then it is fine and if you also produce it in few lines, I also think it is good. The problem is that most users are focused on post count and they want to make sure that whatever they post should make up for their payment and that is being selfish. Someone can make a joke in few lines but if it does not get to the number of words to qualify the post to be included in the count, they keep writing and making the content to be distorted then losing the intent at the end. I believe writing what is in your mind is better to achieve the reply you want and you can make time to make a another post for your campaign count.