Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Topic OP
Bitcoin maximalism: good or bad?
by
peter0425
on 31/05/2025, 12:38:32 UTC
A lot of us are aware of the ideology Bitcoin maximalism. To put it short, a bitcoin maximalist believes that bitcoin is the one and only crypto needed. A bitcoin maximalist believes that bitcoin will be the only crypto to give you significant profit and the one that is the most useful in the real world.

Some of the prominent bitcoin maximalists are Michael Saylor, Max Keiser, and Jack Dorsey.

As the original crypto, bitcoin’s blockchain is the longest (it stores the most blocks of transactions), making it harder and more expensive to hack. Bitcoin's originality also plays a huge benefit since it is now the most trusted crypto in the industry. A lot of people associate crypto with just bitcoin. Bitcoin has built a brand of its own. Most importantly, it grew without any real authority hovering over it. The growth of bitcoin laid on the people believing in it. Now, bitcoin is being adapted all over the world not just by your average citizens but governments at large.

Bitcoin might be the best cryptocurrency but should we play into the bitcoin maximalist idea? A lot of people argue that this is harmful as this closes off innovation. Altcoins may not share bitcoin’s track record, but they’re responsible for the majority of the innovation in the crypto space over the last nine years. Altcoins are responsible for experimenting new tech, new networks and etc. Some of which could be even applied to bitcoin, yes?

Personally, I believe that most of your portfolio should contain bitcoin but choosing a few good altcoins can't be all too bad. There could still profit in altcoins but we may just have to tread lightly. Would you consider yourself a bitcoin maximalist?