I'm considering applying this principle on the local board - it is bad for merit circulation to allow unsued souce to expire.
High quality: 5-6 merits ( could be higher in some cases)
Medium: 3-4 merits
Normal: 1-2
This way members can have enough Smerits to Merit another member to help in circulation.
what are your thoughts on this ?
If they complain about amounts, tell them to complain to me. It's best if sources try to exhaust their source allocations, even if it means giving posts higher amounts than is typical. If you have 150 source merit and you only see 3 merit-worthy posts in a month, then I'd rather you over-give each of them 50 merit than let the merit expire. That way there are more people capable of sending merit, and the "merit economy" is less top-down.
This would be very great. Am sure you have voiced out the thoughts and intentions of all. Cos situations dey wey person go think and think, make research finish just to come up with a quality post but at the end of the day no merits would be given or even if any is given it maybe 1 or 2. Am really happy about this keep this dear moderator.