Changing the structure now is a problem.
I guess we cant really change the rules midway huh
Nice spotting mv, the
draw problem. I also think that we can't change the rules after two league tournaments. IMO it is not that bad. We have on average let's assume 35 players so technically you have 3*4 = 12 places paid if you don't look at every individual league tournament in isolation. We are going to have the same players more or less anyway.
But again, this is just my interpretation and we could have some exciting changes in the next event as others feel. I am ok with it however you guys feel comfortable.
@
arallmuus to have a one-hand-all-in kind of solution to the draw situation. While it is quick and practical, I don't particularly like it, but if those who are affected will agree to this sort of solution, I am fine with it. I won't be affected anyway, so up to whoever might be (or King Royse has the last word of course).
If we have around 30 people, the least we can do in the next series is something like giving the first three an edge, and then have a flatly decreasing point structure similar to formula 1. I think finishing 1st should be additionally awarded. But it shouldn't be set up the way it is now. At this point if a player has zero points gathered, a 3rd place is probably not even worth it anymore as it would require the player to have at least another 3rd place finish in the fourth round.