I believe that talented gamblers always exist but it is not a skill they are born with but a skill they have because they often play the game so that over time they know more about what to do but of course in the end losing is still losing, meaning even though a gambler is quite professional in their field but still they will never be free from what is called defeat.
The reason is because in any case gambling has a dealer advantage, there is a certain portion that you must give to the dealer through a losing scenario and that is the reason why a gambler must always set limits and know when to stop.
Yes, but the money that the dealer takes from the gambler affects the latter's earnings only in the long run. If the gambler came to the casino and played a couple of games, then the dealer's influence on the gambler's overall monetary result will not affect. Therefore, I often thought that every gambler should not play long sessions, and make only a few bets, give Fortune a chance to change his fate. And if this does not happen in the first few bets, then there is no point in playing in the casino further.
But then I realized that there is a flip side to the issue: only over a long distance does the luck factor decrease, making the player's skill more influential.