It is funny to see you playing victim when you are the one acting funny here, You have been explaining this point void of proper understanding and more than two people have been correcting you, but you proved adamant. At a point I was tempted to ask you if you were merely fulfilling your post count with such display because it was very obvious you were spamming this thread with your replies.
Anyways... Good thing you have decided to stop and.... bad thing you decided not to learn.... Good riddance
If you don't have something reasonable to say you should just keep quiet. I followed the argument of @LGD2Business and @Tmoonz from the beginning and both men are right in their different perspectives. So I don't see the reason why you will say @LGD2Business is spamming the thread. It was a constructive argument and I believe people who followed the argument has learnt few things from it. @LGD2Business was more concerned where the money was going to come from if you don't have a regular cash flow, while @Tmoonz was of the opinion that there are people whose money comes periodically yet they can still invest in bitcoin.
Yes there are contractors whose money don't come regular, but when it does come, they can have portion of it which is considered as discretionary invested in bitcoin, while they wait for other contracts to mature in the future before they can buy more and add to their portfolio. Sometimes proceeds from sale of inheritance can also be invested bitcoin. In nutshell both people with regular sources and periodic (irregular) income can invest in bitcoin. So there's no need insulting anyone regarding this argument between @LGD2Business and @Tmoonz