Usually, people don't get divorced without a reason; there is always a reason, and at least one will look offended. So if a woman has the opportunity to take everything for herself, then I'm with her; let the man start all over again.
Merely reading these sentences, I can immediately see someone supporting her fellow female with ultimate bias, you think the man starting all over again is the best option? What if the woman was the infidel one and had more finances, would you prefer that the man takes everything, and the woman starts all over again? or do you think men are the only causes of divorce? Your statement reiterates women as gold diggers who use marriage as their gold mine, and it is not a very good image.
The laws are usually against the male folks. If a woman is richer and wants a divorce due to her own fault, I hope the court will just give the man all. If a man doesn't treat his family well and spends his money carelessly, he deserves to be forced by the court to provide for them. But if the court uncovers that the woman is a gold digger, she should go with nothing. The case of PSG footballer Hakimi is a clear example of how women target rich folks and steal from them through divorce. The Moroccan player was smart to register all he owned in his mother's name.