Usually, people don't get divorced without a reason; there is always a reason, and at least one will look offended. So if a woman has the opportunity to take everything for herself, then I'm with her; let the man start all over again.
Merely reading these sentences, I can immediately see someone supporting her fellow female with ultimate bias, you think the man starting all over again is the best option? What if the woman was the infidel one and had more finances, would you prefer that the man takes everything, and the woman starts all over again? or do you think men are the only causes of divorce? Your statement reiterates women as gold diggers who use marriage as their gold mine, and it is not a very good image.
The user is retarded and just posting nonsense for the campaign that they are in, ignore it.
I believe the financial infidelity most happen in the western world due to the laws that favor some gender over others, and I believe the law need to be amendment because some of the favor gender (woman) are abusing the benefits through the habit of using to steal from some man and turning them into something they didnt wanted. Besides, some men have lost their lives through the act by committing suicide.
It is not so probable that the world will change in your favor, don't wait for miracles. Protect yourself with time. Never enter into a marriage without a contract in a system that has joint assets. Somebody who really loves you and has no sinister motives will sign any number of contracts for you, they could not care less if they don't receive a single dollar in case they lose you.. Somebody who does not really love you, and is looking out for financial interest is not like that.