Did I mention your name? No I didn't.
But now that you bring it up. Yes, you investigating the private person and not the player is a move that shouldn't have been brought up in the first place. You shouldn't be so eager to defend BC. What OP does in his private life doesn't have anything to do with BC. They thankfully took his deposits, didn't they. But once a player wins there is suddenly an issue with him? It was the same with the guy that got paid 7 million or whatever it was, back when BC still had some money to pay. They only paid him because they were assured he would deposit a big chunk back and continue playing, the player himself told me that. In return they would get a nice reputation boost.
Yet here BC got praised they paid him. Praised for what I wonder, for paying a rightful winner the money he won? Guess he should be thankful they paid him. 

Now that money is more tight obviously paying out wins gets more tricky.

You should stay more unbiased. In the past weeks/months it looks a bit off. While you did a nice job in the beginning what you do now really changed from your first approach. Just my personal observation.