We can argue sports betting is about knowledge a person has about sports but at the end of the day, a person who merely goes with favorite, will also get his picks often right. So is sports betting actually about knowledge?
The knowledge is like framework of this betting. That's what gives your prediction some shape, pattern and also allows you to access some odds that you wouldn't dare try to. So overall, the dauntless "you" can only be built if you have profound knowledge of what the outcome would be regardless...(Maybe unless you just wanna shove your money away).
You can actually win without with the underdogs; after all this whole process wouldn't be called "gambling" if the only pattern to win with is wagering on "favourites" alone. In whatever you do, firstly, acquire the knowledge to an easy approach in gambling. People are really getting it twisted on your post -- hahahahaha!!
So many people are misunderstanding the word, 'favorite' here. What I meant here is oddmaker's favorite. Suppose, a competition is held between two teams 'A' and 'B' with odds 1.2 for former and 2.0 for latter, then former is favorite, and bettor can bet on this favorite without having iota of knowledge about sports itself and still likely win the bet.
[/quote]