[...] or holydarkness[...]
I'm sorry, but I have to choose to back down from this one. Last case where I pour everything and go to a length for a player due to a small lapse in humanity. And for that, they dragged me to the muds and throw me under the bus and let the bus hit a freight train that keeps on going. Kinda leave a bitter taste, given that member knows exactly how much I poured into his case and yet he "sacrifice" me to validate his story.
Plus, I'm not mods, so I certainly not within the eligibility of what xyes representative require. Unfortunately, I can't find XYes on AG, so...
Xyes Official, one thing I'd like to say, [even though I can't see that "no-KYC" banner anywhere], if your casino is not no-KYC web3 betting, and can ask for KYC in the fineprint of your ToS, don't put a banner saying otherwise and hide under the excuse that detailed explanation in the banner is not possible, because every human being that passed elementary school knows all you need is a small asterix and very far under the banner, very small, there is this words "*Terms and Condition applied".
It's being used by literally every promo in this world. RL and crypto and cyber and world-wide-web, perhaps event the Mariana-trench web.
You can add link to that "terms and condition" words, that redirect users to your ToS page.
the epic about casinos without kyc verification has already been understood by everyone, that they misled players. now the issue of arbitrage bets on sports is on the agenda, how are they going to prove it, when a person made only 3 bets on sports and it was enough for them to make their verdict, and these were ordinary bets, not some errors in the line, everything was within the bounds of decency, the provider would have corrected the errors in the line, but it was the arbitrage that the casino itself saw. how?