Re: [Call to action] BC.game is not entity that should be trusted.
Share please more info about this lawsuit. I want to join it.
No KYC, no verification of funds. 100% manipulation.
If you lost playing their game, you'll have a lot more trouble recovering anything/proving their games are manipulated without concrete evidence. gho0573d has his funds confiscated, not lost to the games. The cases are different so I doubt you will be able to join the same case.
Not sure whether or not should I release this but just received proof by DFI showing actual fraud taking place.
What would be the reason not to release it? What is the estimated time frame before these frauds are taken offline?
The image being portrayed is definitely as though you are attacking him (even if the intention is the opposite).
As for him working as a public relations person for BC Game, it is not true. BC Game is not the only casino that has scam accusations against them and holydarkness has been active in many scam accusation threads about different casinos too. He volunteers a lot of his time trying to resolve cases, at least that should be acknowledged rather than his reputation being called in to question.
As for him working as a public relations person for BC Game, it is not true. BC Game is not the only casino that has scam accusations against them and holydarkness has been active in many scam accusation threads about different casinos too. He volunteers a lot of his time trying to resolve cases, at least that should be acknowledged rather than his reputation being called in to question.
Well, the difference would be through my posts and actions. I am not using that feedback to attack hd, I am simply stating that he is acting as their public relations person (which, he is, as he is handling basically all of their scam accusation threads for them in the exact same way as if he were to be employed by them to do so).
I will make my stance a clearer - I find it very hard to believe that a casino can do so much wrongdoing and that the one user on this forum is preventing that casino from being labelled as a scam, because they are essentially handling their cases for them. It is hard to believe that this user has not thought "wow, there are just too many cases, something is not right here" unless they are not some way incentivized to not think about it. It is also hard to believe that someone who had a genuine intention of helping players to not also have the same thought about not just bc.game (despite it being a clearly leading culprit according to the data posted by gh0573d) but also about other casinos.
I understand your stance and thought the same. But the thing is: BCgame have very "positive" history in solving all the cases and providing various "evidence" of players' wrongdoing is something that he never questioned. Because, at the end, why would they be lying?
As for other players, they became dismissive after they got the public "resolution" thinking they actually did something wrong, it just can't be that every ADR is telling them they did something wrong, yet they "claim" they didn't?
I didn't quite understand you though the big question is how many people have their funds locked and do not post on the forum (maybe due to language barrier, not being able to/wanting to complete the KYC to begin with, or other reasons)
On the other side, lets look at my case specifically. They want to convince me I actually:
- Created third account
- Self-referred that account to my main one
- While I was having $1m in Vault in my main account
- And jeopardize of getting my funds taken just (according to blurry image) for mere $250 deposit
- While that third account was never in fact banned?
Nah, not going to happen.
- Created third account
- Self-referred that account to my main one
- While I was having $1m in Vault in my main account
- And jeopardize of getting my funds taken just (according to blurry image) for mere $250 deposit
- While that third account was never in fact banned?
Nah, not going to happen.
I'm sure they try to convince many players of wrongdoing, especially as the number gets larger.
small victory!
Just been informed that court has validated our request for asset seizure in case against Fenice Tech Limited (owners of BC game) and has scheduled expedited hearing next Wednesday.
If approved, both domains bc.game and bcgame.com will be suspended after such request is approved. Including all of their assets in Cyprus.
Congratulations
I'm following and supporting this case as I've done enough reading and researching to know that bc.game are a fraudulent entity. I do hope you are not trolling with your journey, and are succeeding as you say you are. One thing that I am concerned about is how fast this is moving. I have never heard of a case move through courts so quickly. Usually the legal process is a very long and painful one.As I'm still newbie in terms of "cutting" quotes, I'll address them in order.
1 - It contains personally identifiable information on parties involved - specifically UBO of Blockdance and Director of Fenice Tech Limited (although director's name is already public). I am willing to share this finding for confirmation with admin/mod.
2 - Many people follow steps on trying to recover their account, steps being: inquire casino, ADR request. Very few stops there thinking that ADRs decision is final, although none of them ever seen any supporting evidence in cases against them when ADR decides it's (Rejected). I've seen few examples here on Bitcointalk where after "ruling" was made that there is supporting evidence to reject the claim, player replied "I am sure I did nothing wrong" and just went on their way either playing somewhere else or not playing at all. Those who goes to collect their winnings legally, in most cases (when casino is reasonable enough) either see the evidence even before it hits the court (response to legal demand) or settle. In case of BC.game, none of the evidence ever existed even when it was presented to the court (in my case), and only appeared after I have publicly called them out or seek ADR process months after legal course.
3 - Unfortunately, this is their MO. I am (at this moment) aware of two other cases, one being $600k and other $750k being pursued legally.
4 - Well, it's not moving quickly. In regards to that "small victory" court only assessed whether or not we had a valid reasons to file such request, or it was baseless, and made decision to schedule a hearing where we will be providing evidence on which court will determine whether or not to grant such request. This was expedited hearing, and if such is processed, assets of Fenice Tech Limited (including domains bc.game and bcgame.com) will be frozen until actual case against them is finalized. So yeah, although ruling on our request will be swift, waiting for final decision will still be slow.
We're also working with bankruptcy trustee to proceed with asset recovery phase, where we have enough supporting evidence to get the domain name bc.game under her control, and possibly attempt to sell it in order to fund the claims against their legal entities in Curacao.