I mean, they're in two finals, surely you can't call them a weak team? That would mean everyone who finished third (or less) or failed to enter the finals is a terrible team. Feels weird if you can only classify one team as a strong team every season because they won some silverware.
I dislike this all-or-nothing judgment. It would be horrible for a team to sack a coach every season if they failed to win something.
I also don't understand that point of view. People are looking at only what happened at the end. Yeah it wasn't a good ending for Inter in the Serie A and Champions League. But these guys were still one of the most successful 2 teams in both tournaments.

Inter didn't sack Simone Inzaghi after it either. He just wanted to resign and accept Al-Hilal's offer. I respect his success in the Champions League. Eliminating Bayern Munich and the strongest Barcelona in the recent years are both top works.