Interesting take. Comparing Bitcoin with gold actually makes sense. Bitcoin’s limited supply, ease of transfer, and resistance to inflation really do give it an advantage, especially now that fiat money keeps losing value.
And yeah, Michael Saylor’s been ahead of the curve for a while. That Las Vegas Bitcoin Conference next week might just bring some major updates and give more push toward wider adoption.
Yes, comparing Bitcoin with gold will certainly be an interesting topic to discuss. Because currently many people still rely on gold to protect their assets against inflation. But the problem is that many people also do not see that currently there are assets that can protect our assets from inflation and not only protect our assets, but can also give us benefits and that asset is bitcoin. So by holding a Bitcoin conference, it will open the eyes of more people to see future assets in the present, namely bitcoin. It does not mean that gold is a bad investment asset. But when compared, I think bitcoin is much better in certain aspects. Like it's not too complicated to carry anywhere. As long as we have a wallet phrase where our bitcoin is stored, wherever we go, we can still access bitcoin. While gold, if we move house and our gold assets will be moved too, it will certainly be much more difficult, because gold has a physical form that requires extra security when carrying it. So that's why I personally think bitcoin is superior at this time.